storm
09-02 08:33 PM
what about china and mexico? they are badly retrogressed too.
wallpaper pretty nice game especially
nousername
06-09 12:34 PM
No, you can not work on 1099 for any other company.
Yes, the only option is work on cash.
I am currently on H1..working for company A..
Can i work for another company...without transferring my H1 and can i get a 1099 Misc....( they cannot run my payroll as i wont be employed with them)....the work is in the same field...
if 1099 is not feasible.. the only option is to get paid in cash..which i dont want to do..
any inputs.
Yes, the only option is work on cash.
I am currently on H1..working for company A..
Can i work for another company...without transferring my H1 and can i get a 1099 Misc....( they cannot run my payroll as i wont be employed with them)....the work is in the same field...
if 1099 is not feasible.. the only option is to get paid in cash..which i dont want to do..
any inputs.
andm
09-19 09:06 PM
I entered US with a tourist visa in California. Months later, I got married to a US citizen in Austin,Texas. Me and my husband were apprehensive at first to get an immigration lawyer to process my visa but we realized the process of obtaining a visa was not as straight forward as we thought.
We have since decided to hire a lawyer and have met with two attorneys so far. The process is frustrating because of the requirement to pay a consultation fee; we schedule an appointment, meet, and find out that the cost of hiring the lawyer is far greater than what we can afford.
My question is: does anyone know of a good lawyer who charges a reasonable flat fee? $1000 - $1500?
thank you
We have since decided to hire a lawyer and have met with two attorneys so far. The process is frustrating because of the requirement to pay a consultation fee; we schedule an appointment, meet, and find out that the cost of hiring the lawyer is far greater than what we can afford.
My question is: does anyone know of a good lawyer who charges a reasonable flat fee? $1000 - $1500?
thank you
2011 game of target practice is
Blog Feeds
09-07 07:00 PM
Indian Government sources had said that the Bureau of Diplomatic Security had contacted the ministry of external affairs (MEA), India around the time Mr Pacheco was incarcerated for his alleged involvement in the mysterious death of his girlfriend Nadia Torrado � he was in jail from July 9 till July 26, when he was awarded bail. He is a former Goa, India tourism minister Francisco Xavier �Mickky� Pacheco was caught on the backfoot on Sunday once again as reports surfaced that the US State Department�s Bureau of Diplomatic Security had informed India that Mr Pacheco might be involved in a big immigration and money laundering racket.
Mr Pacheco used to operate an employment agency along with his estranged wife Sara Pacheco which specialized in finding employment for Goans abroad. But according to the former minister, he has had nothing to do with the agency since he separated from his wife around four years back.
Mr. Mickey Pacheco has been accused by the US Bureau of Diplomatic Security of running an international immigration and money-laundering racket. The bureau got in touch with the external affairs ministry through the US embassy in Delhi and reportedly backed its allegations with documents and details of banking transactions. The ministry then passed on the information to the CBI. The evidence is being described as substantive. According to the US Bureau of Diplomatic Security report, Pacheco had 15 million dollars in his account in the US. He recently transferred 2 million dollars to India.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2010/09/us_names_pacheco_in_immigratio.html)
Mr Pacheco used to operate an employment agency along with his estranged wife Sara Pacheco which specialized in finding employment for Goans abroad. But according to the former minister, he has had nothing to do with the agency since he separated from his wife around four years back.
Mr. Mickey Pacheco has been accused by the US Bureau of Diplomatic Security of running an international immigration and money-laundering racket. The bureau got in touch with the external affairs ministry through the US embassy in Delhi and reportedly backed its allegations with documents and details of banking transactions. The ministry then passed on the information to the CBI. The evidence is being described as substantive. According to the US Bureau of Diplomatic Security report, Pacheco had 15 million dollars in his account in the US. He recently transferred 2 million dollars to India.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2010/09/us_names_pacheco_in_immigratio.html)
more...
Blog Feeds
05-30 12:30 PM
Silicon Valley Immigration Lawyer Blog Has Just Posted the Following:
Across Silicon Valley and the rest of the U.S., many employers are avoiding layoffs by reducing employee hours or by cutting salaries. However, H-1B visa (http://www.geelaw.com/lawyer-attorney-1054805.html)holders, and their employers, can run afoul of U.S. immigration laws if the salary is cut without a corresponding reduction in hours.
An H-1B employer must attest to the Department of Labor, that the employer is paying the H-1B employee the higher of either: 1) the prevailing wage for the same occupational classification in the same area of employment, or 2) the actual wage level paid by the employer to all employees with similar experience and qualifications for the same job. When submitting the H-1B petition, the employer must state the number of hours per week that they will employ the H-1B worker. So if the prevailing wage for a software engineer in the San Jose metropolitan area is $40/hr., then for a full-time job the annual salary would be $83,200. This would be the minimum that the employer would need to pay annually, and an employer could always pay more.
Suppose your Palo Alto employer informs you that all professionals are taking an across-the-board 15% pay cut. If the prevailing wage for your job is $83,200, a 15% pay cut would lower your salary to $70,720. If your employer started paying you only $70,720 annually while you were still working full-time, your employer would be violating the H-1B regulations, and you could be in violation of your H1-B status. However, if your hours were reduced to only 34 hours per week, then at $40/hour you would earn $70,720 annually. Therefore, an employer and its H-1B employee could properly follow the H-1B regulations by reducing the employee's hours enough to still comply with the prevailing wage. Of course, in this example, the H-1B employee would only be able to work 34 hours per week.
More... (http://www.siliconvalleyimmigrationlawyer.com/2009/11/a-paycut-could-mean-parttime-f.html)
Across Silicon Valley and the rest of the U.S., many employers are avoiding layoffs by reducing employee hours or by cutting salaries. However, H-1B visa (http://www.geelaw.com/lawyer-attorney-1054805.html)holders, and their employers, can run afoul of U.S. immigration laws if the salary is cut without a corresponding reduction in hours.
An H-1B employer must attest to the Department of Labor, that the employer is paying the H-1B employee the higher of either: 1) the prevailing wage for the same occupational classification in the same area of employment, or 2) the actual wage level paid by the employer to all employees with similar experience and qualifications for the same job. When submitting the H-1B petition, the employer must state the number of hours per week that they will employ the H-1B worker. So if the prevailing wage for a software engineer in the San Jose metropolitan area is $40/hr., then for a full-time job the annual salary would be $83,200. This would be the minimum that the employer would need to pay annually, and an employer could always pay more.
Suppose your Palo Alto employer informs you that all professionals are taking an across-the-board 15% pay cut. If the prevailing wage for your job is $83,200, a 15% pay cut would lower your salary to $70,720. If your employer started paying you only $70,720 annually while you were still working full-time, your employer would be violating the H-1B regulations, and you could be in violation of your H1-B status. However, if your hours were reduced to only 34 hours per week, then at $40/hour you would earn $70,720 annually. Therefore, an employer and its H-1B employee could properly follow the H-1B regulations by reducing the employee's hours enough to still comply with the prevailing wage. Of course, in this example, the H-1B employee would only be able to work 34 hours per week.
More... (http://www.siliconvalleyimmigrationlawyer.com/2009/11/a-paycut-could-mean-parttime-f.html)
nashim
05-28 03:01 PM
Q.#11 the date USCIS recieved the application.
Q. #15 Current Immigration Status ... AOS.
Q.#16 Eligibility under 8 CFR 274a.12 ... Selected (c)(9)().
Q. #15 Current Immigration Status ... AOS.
Q.#16 Eligibility under 8 CFR 274a.12 ... Selected (c)(9)().
more...
abhicyber
10-22 10:30 PM
^^^^
2010 Simulator Target Practice
mrajatish
03-05 11:11 AM
This is awesome - any pointers on what groups can be contacted in Washington Seattle?
Raj
Raj
more...
mrsr
08-15 08:01 PM
How many july 2 filers got some kind of communication as such their petition is accepted as of 15 th Aug
Wish you all very happy 60 th Independence day.
Wish you all very happy 60 th Independence day.
hair them for target practice.
neeidd
07-24 05:31 PM
Nsc
Thanks for sharing
Thanks for sharing
more...
gcwanter
07-25 02:12 PM
Yes
hot It#39;s more like target practice
sunnymit
07-18 10:55 PM
i am switching employers and i have about 10k in my 401k with current employer. my next employer does not have the option to start 401k until after one year of service.i am looking for options to rollover my 401k to a IRA in a company. does anyone have any recommendations?thanks in advance
I still have my 401K from my old job that I quit about 3 yrs back into the same (company's) account. The reason I didn't roll them into IRA is that I prob would have made the same selection of mutual funds that I currently have in my 401K. The company is stable so no worries there. Point is, move your money only if you think it will serve you a better purpose or else wait for your new 401K to kick in and after that just roll over the other account directly into the new one...
Just my 2 cents, of course...
I still have my 401K from my old job that I quit about 3 yrs back into the same (company's) account. The reason I didn't roll them into IRA is that I prob would have made the same selection of mutual funds that I currently have in my 401K. The company is stable so no worries there. Point is, move your money only if you think it will serve you a better purpose or else wait for your new 401K to kick in and after that just roll over the other account directly into the new one...
Just my 2 cents, of course...
more...
house osama bin laden target. osama
catopa
10-01 10:10 AM
See details in signature.
India - EB3
PD-11/2002
India - EB3
PD-11/2002
tattoo Target practice
Roger Binny
06-06 04:29 PM
http://www.usimmigrationsupport.org/addresschange.html
more...
pictures Target Practice or scored
gcfriend65
12-18 08:35 AM
I had a soft touch on my LUD for I-485 yesterday. Have received EAD card and been fingerprinted. Waiting for AP approval. Does anyone have a clue what is this in regards to?
dresses and a Target Practice mode
Gator
02-25 12:31 AM
Hi-
My current EAD was issued in 2007 when I filed I-485 + I-140 concurrently. It has since expired. I did not apply for a renewal because I am still on my H1B.
I am applying for a renewal now and had a question regarding filling out form I-765
Q15. Current Immigration Status ( Vistor, Student, etc )
I am still on my H1B. So I think I should write H1B and not AOS. But I am not sure.
I filled (C)(9) for Q16 Eligibility Criteria, and since I live in Ohio I am sending it to USCIS Phoenix Lockbox Facility. My receipt notice is Aug 2007 and to be sure I am including the $380 fee.
Appreciate your help!
Thanks
My current EAD was issued in 2007 when I filed I-485 + I-140 concurrently. It has since expired. I did not apply for a renewal because I am still on my H1B.
I am applying for a renewal now and had a question regarding filling out form I-765
Q15. Current Immigration Status ( Vistor, Student, etc )
I am still on my H1B. So I think I should write H1B and not AOS. But I am not sure.
I filled (C)(9) for Q16 Eligibility Criteria, and since I live in Ohio I am sending it to USCIS Phoenix Lockbox Facility. My receipt notice is Aug 2007 and to be sure I am including the $380 fee.
Appreciate your help!
Thanks
more...
makeup Soccer TARGET PRACTICE – The
dpsg
04-09 05:47 PM
Thanks for everything you guys do to solve the EB related issues.
girlfriend Target Practice gives you only
sadshaq12
11-06 01:13 PM
Hi!
any update on your RFE
its look like NSC is sending RFE for old PD date
mine PD is also 2001 and they ask for 2001 tax return and w2
what did you submit in your rfe response
any update on your RFE
its look like NSC is sending RFE for old PD date
mine PD is also 2001 and they ask for 2001 tax return and w2
what did you submit in your rfe response
hairstyles Naruto Target Practice
beautifulMind
07-05 02:08 PM
Sorry my bad..I did not find it..i was excited when i read this and wanted to post th elink immidiately :)
SK2007
10-10 04:37 PM
Guys,
I spoke to another Border Post official and he suggested that i drive uptp the nearest border and they would refuse my entry to Canada as i don't have a valid visa and i can turn around and come back to US and i can get a new I-94. Do you think it would be safe to do this ?
Any advices?
If you have travelled to Canada in May even if you have a single entry visa into Canda, you are more likely to be let into canda than refused. On the way back if you ask they might issue you a new I-94, strictly speaking they don't have to unless you have stayed some period (I don't know the exact period) out side the country.
Most parents coming to US on visitor visa and wanting to stay in us for more than 6 months apply for new I-94s(extension), just because attempting to cross the border does not give them a new I-94.
I spoke to another Border Post official and he suggested that i drive uptp the nearest border and they would refuse my entry to Canada as i don't have a valid visa and i can turn around and come back to US and i can get a new I-94. Do you think it would be safe to do this ?
Any advices?
If you have travelled to Canada in May even if you have a single entry visa into Canda, you are more likely to be let into canda than refused. On the way back if you ask they might issue you a new I-94, strictly speaking they don't have to unless you have stayed some period (I don't know the exact period) out side the country.
Most parents coming to US on visitor visa and wanting to stay in us for more than 6 months apply for new I-94s(extension), just because attempting to cross the border does not give them a new I-94.
pappu
08-20 03:39 PM
Work travel prevents me from attending the DC rally on the 18th (was going to attend on the 13th), but if anyone is hesitating on whether to go due to funds, i offer $200 if you promise to attend. Send me a private message!
Thanks. Send a note to KanMe about this
Thanks. Send a note to KanMe about this
No comments:
Post a Comment